Indications for use of damage control surgery in civilian trauma patients: a content analysis and expert appropriateness rating study

Journal article

Objectives: To characterize and evaluate indications for use of damage control (DC) surgery in civilian trauma patients.

Background: Although DC surgery may improve survival in select, severely injured patients, the procedure is associated with significant morbidity, suggesting that it should be used only when appropriately indicated.

Methods: Two investigators used an abbreviated grounded theory method to synthesize indications for DC surgery reported in peer-reviewed articles between 1983 and 2014 into a reduced number of named, content-characteristic codes representing unique indications. An international panel of trauma surgery experts (n = 9) then rated the appropriateness (expected benefit-to-harm ratio) of the coded indications for use in surgical practice.

Results: The 1107 indications identified in the literature were synthesized into 123 unique pre- (n = 36) and intraoperative (n = 87) indications. The panel assessed 101 (82.1%) of these indications to be appropriate. The indications most commonly reported and assessed to be appropriate included pre- and intraoperative hypothermia (median temperature <34°C), acidosis (median pH <7.2), and/or coagulopathy. Others included 5 different injury patterns, inability to control bleeding by conventional methods, administration of a large volume of packed red blood cells (median >10 units), inability to close the abdominal wall without tension, development of abdominal compartment syndrome during attempted abdominal wall closure, and need to reassess extent of bowel viability.

Conclusions: This study identified a comprehensive list of candidate indications for use of DC surgery. These indications provide a practical foundation to guide surgical practice while studies are conducted to evaluate their impact on patient care and outcomes.

Authors: Roberts, D; Bobrovitz, N; Zygun, D; Ball, C; Kirkpatrick, A

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
• Journal: Annals of Surgery
• Volume: 263
• Issue: 5
• Pages: 1018-1027
• Publication date: 2016-05-01
• DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001347
• EISSN: 1528-1140
• ISSN: 0003-4932
• Pmid: 26445471
• Language: English
• Keywords: expert appropriateness rating study; content analysis; indications; damage control surgery; wounds and injuries