Journal article icon

Journal article

Comparison of hip function and quality of life of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint at 5 years

Abstract:
To compare the medium-term clinical effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty and resurfacing arthroplasty.Single centre, two-arm, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial with 1:1 treatment allocation.A large teaching hospital in England.122 patients older than 18 years with severe arthritis of the hip joint, suitable for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Patients were excluded if they were considered to be unable to adhere to trial procedures or complete questionnaires.Total hip arthroplasty (replacement of entire femoral head and neck); hip resurfacing arthroplasty (replacement of the articular surface of femoral head only, femoral neck remains intact). Both procedures replaced the articular surface of the acetabulum.The outcome measures were hip function assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol (EQ-5D). Patients were followed up annually for a minimum of 5 years. Outcome data were modelled using the generalised estimating equation methodology to explore temporal variations during follow-up.60 patients were randomly assigned to hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 62 to total hip arthroplasty. 95 (78%) of the 122 original study participants provided data at 5 years. There was a small decrease in both hip functions and quality of life in both groups of patients each year during the 5-year follow-up period. However, there was no evidence of a significant difference between treatments group in the OHS (P=0.333) or the EQ-5D (P=0.501).We previously reported no difference in outcome in the first year after surgery. The current medium-term results also show no evidence of a difference in hip function or health-related quality of life in the 5 years following a total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018849

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Oxford college:
Wolfson College
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3644-1388
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Medical Sciences Division
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
BMJ Open More from this journal
Volume:
8
Issue:
3
Article number:
e018849
Publication date:
2018-03-12
Acceptance date:
2018-01-12
DOI:
ISSN:
2044-6055
Pmid:
29530907


Language:
English
Pubs id:
pubs:831180
UUID:
uuid:0433d329-2b07-4b83-a5c1-b563e021eff1
Local pid:
pubs:831180
Source identifiers:
831180
Deposit date:
2018-03-27

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP