Journal article
Self-monitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertension: an internet-based survey of UK GPs
- Abstract:
- BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that most GPs in the UK use self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) to monitor the control of hypertension rather than for diagnosis. This study sought to assess current practice in the use of self-monitoring and any changes in practice following more recent guideline recommendations. AIM: To survey the views and practice of UK GPs in 2015 with regard to SMBP and compare them with a previous survey carried out in 2011. DESIGN AND SETTING: Web-based survey of a regionally representative sample of 300 UK GPs. METHOD: GPs completed an online questionnaire concerning the use of SMBP in the management of hypertension. Analyses comprised descriptive statistics, tests for between-group differences (z, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and χ(2) tests), and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Results were available for 300 GPs (94% of those who started the survey). GPs reported using self-monitoring to diagnose hypertension (169/291; 58%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 52 to 64) and to monitor control (245/291; 84%; 95% CI = 80 to 88), the former having significantly increased since 2011 (from 37%; 95% CI = 33 to 41; P<0.001) with no change in monitoring for control. More than half of GPs used higher systolic thresholds for diagnosis (118/169; 70%; 95% CI = 63 to 77) and treatment (168/225; 75%; 95% CI = 69 to 80) than recommended in guidelines, and under half (120/289; 42%; 95% CI = 36 to 47) adjusted the SMBP results to guide treatment decisions. CONCLUSION: Since new UK national guidance in 2011, GPs are more likely to use SMBP to diagnose hypertension. However, significant proportions of GPs continue to use non-standard diagnostic and monitoring thresholds. The use of out-of-office methods to improve the accuracy of diagnosis is unlikely to be beneficial if suboptimal thresholds are used.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/bjgp16X687037
Authors
+ National
Institute for Health Research
More from this funder
- Funding agency for:
- Fletcher, B
- McManus, R
- Grant:
- NIHRSPCR-2013-S18
- RP-02-12-015
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 652
- Pages:
- e831-e837
- Publication date:
- 2016-10-27
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-05-24
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:641537
- UUID:
-
uuid:041ed1fb-239b-4c43-b5e6-a97582a298ef
- Local pid:
-
pubs:641537
- Source identifiers:
-
641537
- Deposit date:
-
2017-03-06
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- British Journal of General Practice
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2016 British Journal of General Practice. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from the Royal College of General Practitioners at: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X687037
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record