Journal article icon

Journal article

The relationship between microbial community succession, decay, and anatomical character loss in non‐biomineralized animals

Abstract:
A fundamental assumption of hypothesis‐driven decay experiments is that, during decay, the loss of anatomy follows a sequence broadly controlled by the intrinsic compositional properties of tissues. Recent work investigating the succession of postmortem endogenous microbial communities (thanatomicrobiome) challenges this assumption in that the internal thanatomicrobiome exhibits a predictable succession in response to physical and chemical environmental changes that occur within a carcass. Thus, reproducible sequences of character loss during decay could be controlled by thanatomicrobiome succession dynamics. If so, exceptionally preserved fossil anatomy would reflect a succession of ancient contemporaneous microbial communities, about which we know nothing, rendering decay experiments uninformative. Here, we investigate two questions: (1) what is the role of exogenous and endogenous bacteria during formation of the thanatomicrobiome; and (2) do thanatomicrobiome successions control the sequence of anatomical character loss within a decaying carcass? Our analysis shows that the internal thanatomicrobiome is dominated by endogenous bacteria and that, even in the presence of inoculum, exogenous bacteria do not invade the carcass and replace native bacteria (while the carcass remains intact). This confirms that the use of environmental inoculum in decay experiments introduces a confounding variable. Our analysis also finds no correlation between thanatomicrobiome successions and the sequence of anatomical character loss, supporting the hypothesis that fossil non‐biomineralized characters correlate with their propensity to decay in extant relatives. These findings indicate that the inability to model ancient bacteria does not invalidate decay experiments. We present a synthesis of the role of bacteria in non‐biomineralized fossilization.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/pala.70029

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6563-4720
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-5246-397X
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6514-5452
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
GLAM
Department:
Museum of Natural History
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-6838-5566


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/012mzw131
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/02b5d8509


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Palaeontology More from this journal
Volume:
68
Issue:
5
Article number:
e70029
Publication date:
2025-10-15
Acceptance date:
2025-08-28
DOI:
EISSN:
1475-4983
ISSN:
0031-0239


Language:
English
Keywords:
Source identifiers:
3374341
Deposit date:
2025-10-15
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP