Journal article
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn
- Abstract:
- In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 336.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6
Authors
- Publisher:
- Springer Netherlands
- Journal:
- Neuroethics More from this journal
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 107–118
- Publication date:
- 2016-08-24
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-05-19
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1874-5504
- ISSN:
-
1874-5490
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:641551
- UUID:
-
uuid:03e23c37-6e21-4eff-ab7f-82ac20172412
- Local pid:
-
pubs:641551
- Source identifiers:
-
641551
- Deposit date:
-
2016-09-05
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Douglas, T
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- © The Author 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record