Journal article icon

Journal article

Nonconsensual neurocorrectives and bodily integrity: a reply to Shaw and Barn

Abstract:
In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
HUMS
Department:
Philosophy Faculty
Role:
Author
Publisher:
Springer Netherlands Publisher's website
Journal:
Neuroethics Journal website
Volume:
12
Issue:
1
Pages:
107–118
Publication date:
2016-08-24
Acceptance date:
2016-05-19
DOI:
EISSN:
1874-5504
ISSN:
1874-5490
Source identifiers:
641551
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:641551
UUID:
uuid:03e23c37-6e21-4eff-ab7f-82ac20172412
Local pid:
pubs:641551
Deposit date:
2016-09-05

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP