Journal article icon

Journal article

Clinical utility of self-reported sleep duration and insomnia symptoms in type 2 diabetes prediction

Abstract:
Aims/hypothesis: Suboptimal sleep health is linked to higher risks for incident type 2 diabetes. We aimed to assess the clinical utility of adding self-reported sleep traits to a type 2 diabetes prediction model. Methods: In this cohort study, we used UK Biobank data and Cox proportional hazards models to examine how self-reported sleep duration and insomnia symptoms were associated with incident type 2 diabetes risk. Harrell’s C statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to assess whether sleep traits improved the incident type 2 diabetes discrimination and predictive utility achieved using QDiabetes variables, with and without including a type 2 diabetes polygenic risk score (PGS). Independent replication was explored in the Nurses’ Health Study, the Nurses’ Health Study II and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Results: Extremes of sleep duration and occasional or frequent insomnia symptoms were associated with higher risks for incident type 2 diabetes. In the UK Biobank and replication cohorts, adding sleep traits to the QDiabetes risk score did not improve type 2 diabetes prediction (C statistic: QDiabetes alone 0.8933; QDiabetes + sleep duration 0.8939; QDiabetes + insomnia 0.8931; QDiabetes + sleep traits 0.8935). The corresponding total NRI values were: 0.08 (95% CI −0.18, 0.33), 0.04 (95% CI −0.08, 0.16) and 0.04 (95% CI −0.10, 0.18). Inclusion of PGS data marginally improved the type 2 diabetes risk prediction achieved using The QDiabetes calculator, with or without the inclusion of sleep traits in the model (QDiabetes + PGS: C statistic 0.8945; total NRI 0.20 [95% CI 0.12, 0.28]; QDiabetes + PGS + sleep traits: C statistic 0.8946; total NRI 0.18 [95% CI 0.09, 0.27]). Conclusions/interpretation: While sleep duration and insomnia symptoms were associated with type 2 diabetes risk, they are not useful for improving type 2 diabetes prediction beyond QDiabetes model performance. Inclusion of a type 2 diabetes PGS marginally improved prediction but lacked clear clinical utility. Graphical Abstract:
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-8418-8332
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8420-9167
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-7336-1606
More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0004-4812-0332


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/050rgn017


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Diabetologia More from this journal
Volume:
68
Issue:
11
Pages:
2523-2534
Publication date:
2025-08-02
Acceptance date:
2025-05-30
DOI:
EISSN:
1432-0428
ISSN:
0012186X, 0012-186X


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2267408
Local pid:
pubs:2267408
Source identifiers:
3387946
Deposit date:
2025-10-18
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP