Journal article icon

Journal article

The representation of winter Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in the ECMWF seasonal prediction systems

Abstract:
The simulation and prediction of winter Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in the seasonal prediction systems from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is analysed. Blocking statistics from the operational November‐initialised seasonal hindcasts are evaluated in three generations of models: System3, System4, and System5 (SEAS5). Improvements in the climatological representation of blocking are observed in the most recent model configurations, with reduced bias over North Pacific and Greenland. Minor progress is seen over the European sector, where SEAS5 still underestimates the observed blocking frequency. SEAS5 blocking interannual variability is underestimated too and is proportional to the climatological frequency, highlighting that a negative bias in the blocking frequency implies an underestimation of the interannual variance. SEAS5 predictive skill and signal‐to‐noise ratio remain low, but interesting positive results are found over Western and Central Europe. Improved forecasts with reduced ensemble spread are obtained during El Niño years, especially at low latitudes. Complementary experiments show that the statistics of blocking are improved following atmospheric and oceanic resolution increase. Conversely, they remain largely insensitive to coupled model sea‐surface temperature (SST) errors. On the other hand, the implementation of stochastic parameterisations tends to displace blocking activity equatorward. Finally, by comparing seasonal hindcasts with climate runs using the same model, we highlight that the largest contributors to the chronic underestimation of blocking are persistent errors in the atmospheric model. It is also shown that SST errors have a larger impact on blocking bias in climate runs than in seasonal runs, and that increased ocean model resolution contributes to improved blocking more effectively in climate runs. Seasonal forecasts can thus be considered a suitable test‐bed for model development targeting blocking improvement in climate models.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1002/qj.3974

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0003-3389-7849
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
PHYSICS
Sub department:
Atmos Ocean & Planet Physics
Oxford college:
University College
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society More from this journal
Volume:
147
Issue:
735
Pages:
1344-1363
Publication date:
2021-02-03
Acceptance date:
2021-01-05
DOI:
EISSN:
1477-870X
ISSN:
0035-9009


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
1160046
Local pid:
pubs:1160046
Deposit date:
2021-02-04

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP