Journal article icon

Journal article

Standardisation in acute stroke research: A scoping review of upper limb assessments against Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR) benchmarks

Abstract:
Objective: To examine how well acute stroke studies assessing upper limb sensorimotor capacity align with the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR) recommendations, focussing on the type of assessment tools used, study and participant characteristics, follow-up timings, and the use of clinical and multimodal data. Design: Scoping review. Data sources: Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies published between 01 August 2017 and 30 September 2025. Methods: This review included studies involving adults with stroke who underwent upper limb assessment during the acute phase. Data were extracted on clinical, structural, and functional assessments, as well as follow-up timing, study, and participant characteristics. Of the 3628 identified articles, 132 met the inclusion criteria. Results: While global assessments (e.g. NIH stroke scale [NIHSS]) and impairment-level upper limb assessments (e.g. Upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment) were widely used, activity-level tools (e.g. Action Research Arm Test) were underrepresented. Structural brain imaging was common, though often used only diagnostically, while functional brain imaging and multimodal approaches were rare. Follow-up timing varied, with limited long-term tracking. Demographic reporting was inconsistent, with underrepresentation of young adults and women. Conclusion: Despite progress, significant gaps remain in the standardisation and comprehensiveness of upper limb assessment in acute stroke research. Future studies should better align with SRRR recommendations to improve data comparability and scientific rigour.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1177/02692155251398368

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-7924-0394


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://doi.org/10.13039/100010269
Grant:
203139/A/16/Z
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
10.13039/501100000364
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://doi.org/10.13039/100013790
More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000746


Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Journal:
Clinical Rehabilitation More from this journal
Volume:
40
Issue:
4
Pages:
509-522
Publication date:
2025-11-26
Acceptance date:
2025-11-04
DOI:
EISSN:
1477-0873
ISSN:
0269-2155


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2343359
Local pid:
pubs:2343359
Source identifiers:
3884337
Deposit date:
2026-03-25
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP