Journal article
Reducing short-acting beta-agonist overprescribing in asthma: lessons from a quality-improvement prescribing project in East London
- Abstract:
-
Background
Excess prescription and use of short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) inhalers is associated with poor asthma control and increased risk of hospital admission.Aim
To quantify the prevalence and identify the predictors of SABA overprescribing.Design and setting
A cross-sectional study using anonymised clinical and prescribing data from the primary care records in three contiguous East London boroughs.Method
Primary care medical record data for patients aged 5-80 years, with 'active' asthma were extracted in February 2020. Explanatory variables included demography, asthma management, comorbidities, and prescriptions for asthma medications.Results
In the study population of 30 694 people with asthma, >25% (1995/7980), were prescribed ≥6 SABA inhalers in the previous year. A 10-fold variation between practices (<6% to 60%) was observed in the proportion of patients on ≥6 SABA inhalers/year. By converting both SABAs and inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to standard units the accuracy of comparisons was improved across different preparations. In total, >25% of those taking ≥6 SABAs/year were underusing ICSs, this rose to >80% (18 170/22 713), for those prescribed <6 SABAs/year. Prescription modality was a strong predictor of SABA overprescribing, with repeat dispensing strongly linked to SABA overprescribing (odds ratio 6.52, 95% confidence interval = 4.64 to 9.41). Increasing severity of asthma and multimorbidity were also independent predictors of SABA overprescribing.Conclusion
In this multi-ethnic population a fifth of practices demonstrate an overprescribing rate of <20% a year. Based on previous data, supporting practices to enable the SABA ≥12 group to reduce to 4-12 a year could potentially save up to 70% of asthma admissions a year within that group.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 168.6KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0725
Authors
- Publisher:
- Royal College of General Practitioners
- Journal:
- British Journal of General Practice More from this journal
- Volume:
- 72
- Issue:
- 722
- Pages:
- e619-e626
- Publication date:
- 2022-06-14
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1478-5242
- ISSN:
-
0960-1643
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
2407021
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2407021
- Source identifiers:
-
W4282924156
- Deposit date:
-
2026-04-23
- ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record