Journal article icon

Journal article

Outcomes from a structured conflict management programme implemented at three paediatric healthcare sites: a mixed-methods evaluation

Abstract:
Objective: Evaluation of the Medical Mediation Foundation’s Conflict Management Programme (CMP)—a structured process for managing conflict. Design: Mixed-methods evaluation using Kirkpatrick’s framework, a four-level model for evaluating training. Setting: Three National Health Service children’s hospitals from 2021 to 2024. Interventions: 904 unique participants attended 179 tiered training sessions, totalling 2104 attendances. Main outcome measures: Quantitative data was collected via pre-training/immediate post-training surveys including the Turnover Intention Scale, and the Brief Resilience Scale. Pre-training/post-training scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, with a conservative Bonferroni correction applied to each set of tests. Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews at one and three years analysed using Braun and Clarke’s standard approach to thematic analysis. Results: 664 participants (71%) completed pre-training evaluation questionnaires, and 569 (63%) immediate post-training, reflecting immediate benefits of training. 26 interviews were conducted, demonstrating sustained behaviour change over three-year follow-up. Knowledge scores increased significantly (all p<0.002), and staff reported improved confidence and empathy. Behavioural changes included early conflict recognition and improved team communication. Self-reported scoring of conflict management skills improved significantly across all measured domains (all p<0.004). Organisational impact included improved staff-family relationships, improved workplace culture and perceived time-savings. There were subtle improvements in resilience (p=0.038), though no significant change in turnover intention (p=0.434). Conclusions: Implementation of the CMP produced individual and organisational benefits, which were sustained over time. The importance of institutional support, dedicated resources and integration into organisational structures was highlighted.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/archdischild-2025-329335

Authors

More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0009-0006-2099-7487
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
Archives of Disease in Childhood More from this journal
Pages:
archdischild-2025-329335
Article number:
archdischild-2025-329335
Publication date:
2026-04-15
Acceptance date:
2026-03-08
DOI:
EISSN:
1468-2044
ISSN:
0003-9888


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2410054
Local pid:
pubs:2410054
Source identifiers:
3960546
Deposit date:
2026-04-21
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP