Is it mere distraction? Peri-traumatic verbal tasks can increase analogue flashbacks but reduce voluntary memory performance.

Journal article

Several experiments have shown that we can reduce the frequency of analogue flashbacks with competing tasks presented during a trauma film (i.e. peri-traumatically). A "distraction" hypothesis suggests that any competing task may reduce flashbacks due to distraction and/or a load on executive control. Alternatively, a "modality" hypothesis based on clinical models of PTSD suggests that certain tasks will not protect against intrusions (Experiment 1) and could actually increase them (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 contrasted two concurrent tasks, Verbal Interference (counting backwards in threes) and Visuospatial tapping, against a no-task Control condition during trauma film viewing. The Visuospatial group had significantly fewer intrusions of the film over 1-week than the Control group. Contrary to a distraction account, the Verbal Interference group did not show this effect. Using a larger sample, Experiment 2 showed that the Verbal Interference group (counting backwards in sevens) had more intrusions (and inferior voluntary memory) than no-task Controls. We propose that this is in line with a modality hypothesis concerning trauma flashbacks. Disrupting verbal/conceptual processing during trauma could be harmful for later flashbacks.

Authors: Bourne, C; Frasquilho, F; Roth, A; Holmes, E

• Publication status: Published
• Journal: Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 316-324
• Publication date: 2010-09-01
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.03.001
• EISSN: 1873-7943
• ISSN: 0005-7916
• Language: English
• Keywords: Male; Memory; Humans; Wounds and Injuries; Female; Motion Pictures as Topic; Psychomotor Performance; Mental Recall; Verbal Behavior; Adult; Executive Function