Journal article
The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty
- Abstract:
-
Aims: Periprosthetic fracture (PF) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication. This study aims to investigate the influence of cemented stem designs on the risk of needing a revision for a PF.
Patients and Methods: We analysed data on 257 202 primary THAs with cemented stems and 390 linked first revisions for PF recorded in the National Joint Registry (NJR) of England, Wales and Northern Ireland to determine if a cemented femoral stem brand was associated with the risk of having revision for a PF after primary THA. All cemented femoral stem brands with more than 10 000 primary operations recorded in the NJR were identified. The four most commonly used cemented femoral stems were the Exeter V40 (n = 146 409), CPT (n = 24 300), C-Stem (n = 15 113) and Charnley (n = 20 182).
We compared the revision risk ratios due to PF amongst the stems using a Poisson regression model adjusting for patient factors. Compared with the Exeter V40, the age, gender and ASA grade adjusted revision rate ratio was 3.89 for the cemented CPT stem (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.07 to 4.93), 0.89 for the C-Stem (95% CI 0.57 to 1.41) and 0.41 for the Charnley stem (95% CI 0.24 to 0.70).
Conclusions: The limitations of the study include incomplete data capture, analysis of only PF requiring revision and that observation does not imply causality. Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that the choice of a cemented stem may influence the risk of revision for PF.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 172.2KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36534
Authors
- Publisher:
- British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Journal:
- Bone and Joint Journal More from this journal
- Volume:
- 98B
- Issue:
- 10
- Pages:
- 1347-1354
- Publication date:
- 2016-10-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-05-06
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2049-4408
- ISSN:
-
2049-4394
- Pmid:
-
27694588
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:719027
- UUID:
-
uuid:01bd2c77-c74f-4fca-b835-4ef872278956
- Local pid:
-
pubs:719027
- Source identifiers:
-
719027
- Deposit date:
-
2018-07-17
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- This is the author accepted manuscript following peer review version of the article. The final version is available online from British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery at: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B10.36534
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record