Journal article

Stochastic dominance and opaque sweetening

Abstract:: This paper addresses the problem of opaque sweetening and argues that one should use stochastic dominance in comparing lotteries even when dealing with incomplete orderings that allow for non-comparable outcomes.

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Bader, R. (2017). Stochastic dominance and opaque sweetening. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 498–507.

MLA Style

Bader, R. “Stochastic Dominance and Opaque Sweetening.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 96, no. 3, Routledge, 2017, pp. 498–507.

Chicago Style

Bader, R. 2017. “Stochastic Dominance and Opaque Sweetening.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 498–507.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: Dominance and opaque sweetening (R. Bader).pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 71.0KB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1362566

Authors

+ Bader, R More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Oxford college:: Merton College
Role:: Author

Publisher:: Routledge
Journal:: Australasian Journal of Philosophy More from this journal
Volume:: 96
Issue:: 3
Pages:: 498-507
Publication date:: 2017-08-16
Acceptance date:: 2017-07-28
DOI:: 10.1080/00048402.2017.1362566
EISSN:: 1471-6828
ISSN:: 0004-8402

Keywords:: stochastic dominance

parity

state-by-state dominance

incompleteness

decision theory
Pubs id:: pubs:710945
UUID:: uuid:000a9838-8c7e-46a3-b12d-3438ce9682a8
Local pid:: pubs:710945
Source identifiers:: 710945
Deposit date:: 2017-08-08

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: Australasian Association of Philosophy
Copyright date:: 2017
Notes:: Copyright © 2017 Australasian Association of Philosophy. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis Group. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Routledge at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1362566

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP