Journal article icon

Journal article

Sentencing procedures under the adversarial and inquisitorial models of justice: a comparative analysis

Alternative title:
Sentencing procedures: a comparative analysis
Abstract:
This article examines the key procedural distinction in sentencing between adversarial (common law) and inquisitorial (civil law) systems: bifurcation versus unification. Common law jurisdictions separate sentencing from the trial phase, while civil law systems integrate sentencing within the verdict determination. The article examines the implications of these approaches and assesses their strengths and weaknesses. Bifurcation allows for a focused mitigation hearing, ensures that all relevant information is considered prior to sentencing, and minimises potential bias from prior convictions or sentencing factors during trial. However, it also prolongs proceedings and can lead to inefficiencies. By contrast, unified sentencing integrates all relevant factors into a single hearing, streamlining the process but potentially exposing defendants to prejudicial considerations before a verdict is reached. While neither tradition is likely to fully abandon its approach, the authors suggest that if a new jurisdiction were to adopt a sentencing model, the adversarial system—with modifications to increase efficiency—would be preferable. They conclude by calling for further empirical research to assess the comparative impact of these systems on sentencing outcomes and perceptions of fairness.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Publisher copy:
10.1007/s10609-025-09506-5

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Criminal Law Forum More from this journal
Volume:
36
Issue:
2
Pages:
329-349
Publication date:
2025-04-24
Acceptance date:
2025-04-03
DOI:
EISSN:
1572-9850
ISSN:
1046-8374


Language:
English
Pubs id:
2121706
Local pid:
pubs:2121706
Source identifiers:
3066072
Deposit date:
2025-06-30
ARK identifier:
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.

Terms of use


Views and Downloads

Views and downloads will return soon






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP