Executive Power under the Constitution: A Presidential and Parliamentary System Compared

Journal article

Abstract:: In Part I of this Article, we provide a brief overview of the major points of comparison between the constitutional structures of the Australian and U.S. systems, as highlighted in Bruff’s 2014 article, with particular attention to the differences between the American separation of powers and the Australian practice of responsible government.
In Part II, we explore the adoption and practice of responsible government in Australia in greater depth. We highlight that while, in theory, in the domestic sphere the Australian government is “responsible” and accountable to the Parliament, modern legislative practice has often failed to hold the executive to account within this system. In the foreign sphere, the practice is reversed, with greater parliamentary oversight introduced into a system of previously unbounded prerogative power
In Part III, we explain the different aspects of executive power under the Australian Constitution, exploring the exercise of these powers and their regulation against the framework and ideals of responsible government and accountability. We investigate the circumstances under which the Australian government relies on nonstatutory executive power, and how the Australian High Court has attempted to limit and regulate this power using the constitutional structure of responsible government.

Keywords:: Constitutional Structure

Organisation of Executive Power in Australia

Nationhood Power

Responsible Government

Australian Executive Power

Adoption of Responsible Government in Australia

Prerogative Powers

Differences in the Executive Branches
Pubs id:: pubs:679264
UUID:: uuid:d45f1c9c-49bf-40e2-88b8-959733829f7d
Local pid:: pubs:679264
Source identifiers:: 679264
Deposit date:: 2017-02-10
ARK identifier:: ark:/29072/ora_d45f1c9c49bf40e288b8959733829f7d

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record