Journal article icon

Journal article : Review

Guideline of guidelines: a critical appraisal of the evidence for PSA retesting intervals

Abstract:

Objectives: Patients may undergo prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing due to symptoms or by request. Unless the result of the test is clearly abnormal it is unclear whether PSA should be retested and if it should, at what interval. The aim of this systematic review of clinical practice guidelines was to summarise the recommendations for PSA retesting intervals and evaluate the evidence cited by each guideline.

Methods: We searched PubMed and TRIP for guidelines written in English and developed or updated in 2013-2024. Guideline quality assessment was done using the AGREE II tool. We narratively synthesised results.

Results: Eleven guidelines were included. Ten (91%) recommended PSA retesting intervals around two-to-four years. 37 studies were referenced as evidence for the recommended intervals across the eleven guidelines. Five (14%) of these had the objective of determining PSA retesting intervals. 14(38%) studies analysed single PSA test results. Five (45%) guideline recommendations partially aligned with the evidence referenced and five (45%) did not align.

Conclusions: Generally, for asymptomatic patients aged 50+ with PSA levels between 1 and 3ng/ml, most guidance recommended a retesting interval of two-to four-years with the possibility to extend the interval to four-to-ten years for patients with a PSA value

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1111/bju.16809

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-3006-8730
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
BJU International More from this journal
Volume:
136
Issue:
3
Pages:
372-384
Publication date:
2025-07-03
Acceptance date:
2025-05-18
DOI:
EISSN:
1464-410X
ISSN:
1464-4096


Language:
English
Keywords:
Subtype:
Review
Pubs id:
2125494
Local pid:
pubs:2125494
Deposit date:
2025-05-22
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP