Journal article
Victimhood: the most powerful force in morality and politics
- Abstract:
- Victimhood drives morality and politics. Morality evolved to protect people from victimization, and today morality still revolves around concerns about victimhood and harm. Unfortunately, liberals and conservatives often perceive different victims, which creates political division. In this review of the psychology of perceived victimhood, we demonstrate its power and complexity. First, we look at our evolutionary past to explore why victimhood is so psychologically powerful, and highlight one neglected fact about human nature: humans are more prey than predator. Second, we examine three different kinds of victimhood--individual, group, and moral--and how tension between them sets the stage for conflict. Third, we explore how victimhood matters in judgments of others. Perceived victimhood forms the core of moral judgments: people condemn acts based on how much they seem to victimize others. We also explore how people also typecast others as victims or victimizers. Fourth, we review when people see themselves as a victim, and how this licenses selfishness. Finally, we show how victimhood inflames moral and political division, but also how it can bridge divides through sharing and acknowledging experiences of suffering.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 1.3MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/bs.aesp.2024.03.004
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 70
- Pages:
- 137-220
- Publication date:
- 2025-05-31
- Acceptance date:
- 2024-10-16
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1557-8410
- ISSN:
-
0065-2601
- Language:
-
English
- Pubs id:
-
2298871
- Local pid:
-
pubs:2298871
- Deposit date:
-
2025-10-09
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Gray and Kubin
- Copyright date:
- 2024
- Rights statement:
- © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
- Notes:
- The author accepted manuscript (AAM) of this paper has been made available under the University of Oxford's Open Access Publications Policy, and a CC BY public copyright licence has been applied.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record