Journal article
A vertical mouse and ergonomic mouse pads alter wrist position but do not reduce carpal tunnel pressure in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome
- Abstract:
- Non-neutral wrist positions and external pressure leading to increased carpal tunnel pressure during computer use have been associated with a heightened risk of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study investigated whether commonly used ergonomic devices reduce carpal tunnel pressure in patients with CTS. Carpal tunnel pressure was measured in twenty-one patients with CTS before, during and after a computer mouse task using a standard mouse, a vertical mouse, a gel mouse pad and a gliding palm support. Carpal tunnel pressure increased while operating a computer mouse. Although the vertical mouse significantly reduced ulnar deviation and the gel mouse pad and gliding palm support decreased wrist extension, none of the ergonomic devices reduced carpal tunnel pressure. The findings of this study do therefore not endorse a strong recommendation for or against any of the ergonomic devices commonly recommended for patients with CTS. Selection of ergonomic devices remains dependent on personal preference.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 355.3KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.020
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Applied ergonomics More from this journal
- Volume:
- 47
- Pages:
- 151-156
- Publication date:
- 2015-03-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2014-08-27
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1872-9126
- ISSN:
-
0003-6870
- Pmid:
-
25479984
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:492332
- UUID:
-
uuid:966eb15f-b8a3-4314-a23b-bba206f9585d
- Local pid:
-
pubs:492332
- Source identifiers:
-
492332
- Deposit date:
-
2017-01-23
- ARK identifier:
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier Ltd and the Ergonomics Society
- Copyright date:
- 2015
- Notes:
- © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.020
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record