Journal article icon

Journal article

Transport legacy of mega-events and the redistribution of accessibility to urban destinations

Abstract:
Local governments increasingly justify the hosting of mega-events because of their legacy value, assuming that all local residents benefit from those events. Yet, little attention has been paid to the distributive question of who benefits from the transport legacy left by those events. This paper reflects on the delimitation of transport legacies and its social impacts in terms of how such developments can reshape urban accessibility to opportunities. It analyses the transformation in the transport system of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) in preparation for the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympic Games. That transformation involved substantial expansion in public transport infrastructure, followed by cuts in service levels and a reorganization of many bus lines to streamline the transport system. The paper examines whether those recent changes have increased the number of people from different income levels who could access Olympic sports venues and healthcare facilities by public transport within 15, 30, 60 and 90 min. The analysis uses a before-and-after comparison of Rio's transport network (2014–2017) and a quasi-counterfactual scenario to separate the effects of newly added infrastructure from the reorganization and cuts of transport services. The results show that the infrastructure expansion alone would have increased the number of people who could access the Olympic sports venues, but it would have only marginally improved people's access to healthcare facilities. Nonetheless, the findings indicate that the streamlined bus system have offset the benefits of infrastructure investments in a way that particularly penalizes the poor. The analysis of both the implemented changes to the public transport network and the counterfactual scenario show that the accessibility benefits from the recent cycle of investments and disinvestments in Rio generally accrued to middle- and higher-income groups, reinforcing existing patterns of urban inequality.
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions

Access Document

Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.013

Authors

More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
Social Sciences Division
Department:
SOGE; Transport Studies Unit
Department:
Transport Studies Unit
Role:
Author


Publisher:
Elsevier
Journal:
Cities More from this journal
Volume:
81
Pages:
45-60
Publication date:
2018-03-24
Acceptance date:
2018-03-15
DOI:
ISSN:
0264-2751


Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:833594
UUID:
uuid:4de4ba94-98c7-40ce-9889-172cae2ea591
Local pid:
pubs:833594
Source identifiers:
833594
Deposit date:
2018-04-09
ARK identifier:

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP