Journal article icon

Journal article

Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reporting on blinding in protocols and articles describing randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied 73 protocols of trials approved by the scientific/ethical committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, 1994 and 1995, and their corresponding publications. RESULTS: Three out of 73 trials (4%) reported blinding in the protocol that contradicted that in the publication (e.g., "open" vs. "double blind"). The proportion of "double-blind" trials w...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.04.003

Authors


Journal:
Journal of clinical epidemiology More from this journal
Volume:
62
Issue:
9
Pages:
967-973
Publication date:
2009-09-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1878-5921
ISSN:
0895-4356
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:178773
UUID:
uuid:ff37a9c3-f4bc-47b7-b750-d943eca02e50
Local pid:
pubs:178773
Source identifiers:
178773
Deposit date:
2013-11-16

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP