Journal article
Reporting on blinding in trial protocols and corresponding publications was often inadequate but rarely contradictory.
- Abstract:
-
OBJECTIVE: To compare the reporting on blinding in protocols and articles describing randomized controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied 73 protocols of trials approved by the scientific/ethical committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, 1994 and 1995, and their corresponding publications. RESULTS: Three out of 73 trials (4%) reported blinding in the protocol that contradicted that in the publication (e.g., "open" vs. "double blind"). The proportion of "double-blind" trials w...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical epidemiology More from this journal
- Volume:
- 62
- Issue:
- 9
- Pages:
- 967-973
- Publication date:
- 2009-09-01
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1878-5921
- ISSN:
-
0895-4356
Item Description
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:178773
- UUID:
-
uuid:ff37a9c3-f4bc-47b7-b750-d943eca02e50
- Local pid:
-
pubs:178773
- Source identifiers:
-
178773
- Deposit date:
-
2013-11-16
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2009
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record