Journal article icon

Journal article

Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article

Abstract:

Several tools have been developed to evaluate the extent to which the findings from a network meta-analysis would be valid; however, applying these tools is a time-consuming task and often requires specific expertise. Clinicians have little time for critical appraisal, and they need to understand the key elements that help them select network meta-analyses that deserve further attention, optimising time and resources. This paper is aimed at providing a practical framework to assess the method...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1136/eb-2017-102753

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Psychiatry
Role:
Author
Publisher:
BMJ Publishing Group
Journal:
Evidence-based mental health More from this journal
Volume:
20
Issue:
3
Pages:
88-94
Publication date:
2017-07-24
Acceptance date:
2017-06-15
DOI:
ISSN:
1468-960X and 1362-0347
Pmid:
28739577
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:709490
UUID:
uuid:faf6d1a2-5eb8-4509-a3c2-9cd897f2610b
Local pid:
pubs:709490
Source identifiers:
709490
Deposit date:
2017-08-22

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP