Journal article
The effect of surgeon caseload on the relative revision rate of cemented and cementless unicompartmental knee replacements: An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
- Abstract:
-
Background:
Expand abstract
Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) offers substantial benefits compared with total knee replacement (TKR) but is associated with higher revision rates. Data from registries suggest that revision rates for cementless UKR implants are lower than those for cemented implants. It is not known how much of this difference is due to the implant or to other factors, such as a greater proportion of high-volume surgeons using cementless implants. We aimed to de...
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 251.0KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.2106/JBJS.19.01060
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins
- Journal:
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery More from this journal
- Volume:
- 1012
- Issue:
- 8
- Pages:
- 644-653
- Publication date:
- 2020-02-24
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-11-25
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1535-1386
- ISSN:
-
0021-9355
Item Description
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1074544
- UUID:
-
uuid:ecf29369-87cb-4390-a4d7-cb7cf6f966d6
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1074544
- Source identifiers:
-
1074544
- Deposit date:
-
2019-11-27
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Copyright date:
- 2020
- Rights statement:
- Copyright 2020 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins at https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.01060
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record