A tool for investigating systematic bias in BOLD based MRI methods: An implementation of the detailed BOLD signal model The following code was developed using MATLAB R2014b during 2014 in order to investigate sources of systematic bias in calibrated BOLD functional MRI (fMRI) based mapping of the oxygen extraction fraction. However, this tool may be useful for improving our understanding of other BOLD based fMRI methods. SIMBOLD - An implementation of the detailed BOLD signal model (Griffeth and Buxton, 2011) SIMFIGS - Generate the figures contained in the upcoming paper "Sources of systematic bias in calibrated BOLD based mapping of baseline oxygen extraction fraction" by Nicholas P. Blockley et al. SIMBOLD takes parameter-value pairs for 22 physical or physiological parameters. The detailed BOLD signal model, on which it is based, has the following main features; - consists of a volume weighted sum of 4 compartments - compartments are 1 extravascular and 3 intravascular (arterial, capillary, venous) - intravascular signals are modelled using the results of blood relaxometry - extravascular signals are modelled using the results of numerical simulations The detailed BOLD signal model was modified in the following ways; - arterial CBV was given its own "Grubb constant" rather than being the remainder of total CBV change once the capillary and venous CBV change is removed - venous oxygen saturation was modelled using a unified model for changes in CBF, CMRO2, and PaO2, rather than as individual non-combinable components SIMFIGS has only one argument, which is the number of physiological states to generate. In the paper this value is set to 1000. SIMFIGS also gives useful examples of the syntax for using SIMBOLD. References Griffeth, V.E.M., Buxton, R.B., 2011. A theoretical framework for estimating cerebral oxygen metabolism changes using the calibrated-BOLD method: Modeling the effects of blood volume distribution, hematocrit, oxygen extraction fraction, and tissue signal properties on the BOLD signal. Neuroimage 58, 198–212. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.077