Journal article icon

Journal article

Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches

Abstract:

Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications, extending Bornmann, Mutz, and Daniel's meta-analyses that reported small gender differences in favor of men (d =. 04), but a substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes that compromised the robustness of their results. We contrast these findings with the most comprehensive single primary study (Marsh, Jayas...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.3102/0034654309334143

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
SSD
Department:
Education
Role:
Author
Journal:
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume:
79
Issue:
3
Pages:
1290-1326
Publication date:
2009-09-01
DOI:
ISSN:
0034-6543
Source identifiers:
103427
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:103427
UUID:
uuid:cbc46aa1-9b7e-40ec-babd-b8db4a2dd91f
Local pid:
pubs:103427
Deposit date:
2012-12-19

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP