Journal article
Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches
- Abstract:
-
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications, extending Bornmann, Mutz, and Daniel's meta-analyses that reported small gender differences in favor of men (d =. 04), but a substantial heterogeneity in effect sizes that compromised the robustness of their results. We contrast these findings with the most comprehensive single primary study (Marsh, Jayas...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Journal:
- REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
- Volume:
- 79
- Issue:
- 3
- Pages:
- 1290-1326
- Publication date:
- 2009-09-01
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0034-6543
- Source identifiers:
-
103427
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:103427
- UUID:
-
uuid:cbc46aa1-9b7e-40ec-babd-b8db4a2dd91f
- Local pid:
- pubs:103427
- Deposit date:
- 2012-12-19
Terms of use
- Copyright date:
- 2009
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record