The law and economics debate about secured lending: Lessons for European lawmaking?

Journal article

This review paper is a contribution to a symposium on the 'Future of Secured Credit in Europe'. Its theme is the way in which empirical research has shed light on earlier theoretical literature. These findings tend to suggest that the legal institution of secured credit is, on the whole, socially beneficial, and that such benefits are likely to outweigh any associated social costs. Having made this general claim, the paper then turns to consider the effects of four particular dimensions across which systems of secured credit may differ, and which may therefore be of interest to European law-makers. These are: (i) the scope of permissible collateral; (ii) the efficacy of enforcement; (iii) the priority treatment of secured creditors; and (iv) the mechanisms employed to assist third parties in discovering that security has been granted. In each case, consideration is paid first to the theoretical position, and then empirical findings. It is argued that perhaps the most difficult of these issues for European law-makers concerns the appropriate design of publicity mechanisms for third parties.

Authors: Armour, J

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Journal: European Company and Financial Law Review
• Publication date: 2008-12-01
• DOI: 10.1515/9783110970678.3
• Keywords: secured credit; insolvency priorities; enforcement; European corporate finance; notice filing