Journal article icon

Journal article

Non-abstract numerical representations in the IPS: Further support, challenges, and clarifications

Abstract:
The commentators have raised many pertinent points that allow us to refine and clarify our view. We classify our response comments into seven sections: automaticity; developmental and educational questions; priming; multiple representations or multiple access(?); terminology; methodological advances; and simulated cognition and numerical cognition. We conclude that the default numerical representations are not abstract. © 2009 Cambridge University Press.

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1017/S0140525X09990987

Authors


Journal:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume:
32
Issue:
3-4
Pages:
356-365
Publication date:
2009-01-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1469-1825
ISSN:
0140-525X
URN:
uuid:bf4ef0fa-8a9c-4472-bba7-4bf6c1bf9b71
Source identifiers:
244631
Local pid:
pubs:244631
Language:
English

Terms of use


Metrics


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP