Journal article
Alexithymia explains atypical spatiotemporal dynamics of eye gaze in autism
- Abstract:
- Recognition of emotional facial expressions is considered to be atypical in autism. This difficulty is thought to be due to the way that facial expressions are visually explored. Evidence for atypical visual exploration of emotional faces in autism is, however, equivocal. We propose that, where observed, atypical visual exploration of emotional facial expressions is due to alexithymia, a distinct but frequently co-occurring condition. In this eye-tracking study we tested the alexithymia hypothesis using a number of recent methodological advances to study eye gaze during several emotion processing tasks (emotion recognition, intensity judgements, free gaze), in 25 adults with, and 45 without, autism. A multilevel polynomial modelling strategy was used to describe the spatiotemporal dynamics of eye gaze to emotional facial expressions. Converging evidence from traditional and novel analysis methods revealed that atypical gaze to the eyes is best predicted by alexithymia in both autistic and non-autistic individuals. Information theoretic analyses also revealed differential effects of task on gaze patterns as a function of alexithymia, but not autism. These findings highlight factors underlying atypical emotion processing in autistic individuals, with wide-ranging implications for emotion research.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Accepted manuscript, 1.2MB, Terms of use)
-
(Supplementary materials, 2.6MB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104710
Authors
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Journal:
- Cognition More from this journal
- Volume:
- 212
- Article number:
- 104710
- Publication date:
- 2021-04-13
- Acceptance date:
- 2021-03-26
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
0010-0277
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1168928
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1168928
- Deposit date:
-
2021-03-22
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Elsevier B.V.
- Copyright date:
- 2021
- Rights statement:
- © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Elsevier at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104710
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record