- Abstract:
-
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We characterize the quantity and quality of data tables and figures in reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) submitted to the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and published in peer-reviewed journals. We investigate how the peer review process affected table and figure quality. METHODS: We reviewed 62 consecutive reports of RCTs submitted to the BMJ in 2001 that were later published in the BMJ (n=12) or elsewhere. We counted and categorized the tables and figures in bot...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 750-756.21
- Publication date:
- 2006-12-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1097-6760
- ISSN:
-
0196-0644
- URN:
-
uuid:b91cc0a0-47f4-4d8e-940b-b02d401bb967
- Source identifiers:
-
318002
- Local pid:
- pubs:318002
- Copyright date:
- 2006
Conference
From submission to publication: a retrospective review of the tables and figures in a cohort of randomized controlled trials submitted to the British Medical Journal.
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record