Journal article

Cerebral blood flow sensitivities to CO2 determined by Read's rebreathing method and the steady-state method are not equal

Publication status:: Published

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Pandit, J., Mohan, R., Paterson, N., & Poulin, M. (2000). Cerebral blood flow sensitivities to CO2 determined by Read's rebreathing method and the steady-state method are not equal. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 93(3A), U188–U188.

MLA Style

Pandit, J., et al. “Cerebral Blood Flow Sensitivities to CO2 Determined by Read's Rebreathing Method and the Steady-State Method Are Not Equal.” ANESTHESIOLOGY, vol. 93, no. 3A, 2000, pp. U188–U188.

Chicago Style

Pandit, J, R Mohan, N Paterson, and M Poulin. 2000. “Cerebral Blood Flow Sensitivities to CO2 Determined by Read's Rebreathing Method and the Steady-State Method Are Not Equal.” ANESTHESIOLOGY 93 (3A): U188–U188.
Share
Print

Authors

+ Pandit, J More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Mohan, R More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Paterson, N More by this author

Role:: Author

+ Poulin, M More by this author

Role:: Author

Journal:: ANESTHESIOLOGY More from this journal
Volume:: 93
Issue:: 3A
Pages:: U188-U188
Publication date:: 2000-09-01
ISSN:: 0003-3022

Pubs id:: pubs:357164
UUID:: uuid:b785bacb-4956-4db5-a531-adeb9c916846
Local pid:: pubs:357164
Source identifiers:: 357164
Deposit date:: 2013-11-16

Terms of use

Copyright date:: 2000

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP