Journal article icon

Journal article

Can "realist" randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?

Abstract:

In this paper, we respond to a paper by Jamal and colleagues published in Trials in October 2015 and take an opportunity to continue the much-needed debate about what applied scientific realism is. The paper by Jamal et al. is useful because it exposes the challenges of combining a realist evaluation approach (as developed by Pawson and Tilley) with the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. We identified three fundamental differences that are related to paradigmatic differences in the...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Files:
Publisher copy:
10.1186/s13063-016-1407-0

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
Primary Care Health Sciences
Role:
Author
Expand authors...
Publisher:
BioMed Central Publisher's website
Journal:
Trials Journal website
Volume:
17
Article number:
313
Publication date:
2016-07-07
Acceptance date:
2016-05-03
DOI:
ISSN:
1745-6215
Source identifiers:
632399
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:632399
UUID:
uuid:b6146047-4cf6-44d3-a75e-2269b6141de8
Local pid:
pubs:632399
Deposit date:
2016-07-07

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP