Journal article
Choose, rate or squeeze: Comparison of economic value functions elicited by different behavioral tasks
- Abstract:
-
A standard view in neuroeconomics is that to make a choice, an agent first assigns subjective values to available options, and then compares them to select the best. In choice tasks, these cardinal values are typically inferred from the preference expressed by subjects between options presented in pairs. Alternatively, cardinal values can be directly elicited by asking subjects to place a cursor on an analog scale (rating task) or to exert a force on a power grip (effort task). These tasks ca...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Public Library of Science Publisher's website
- Journal:
- PLoS Computational Biology Journal website
- Volume:
- 13
- Issue:
- 11
- Article number:
- e1005848
- Publication date:
- 2017-11-21
- Acceptance date:
- 2017-10-25
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1553-734X
- Source identifiers:
-
813282
Item Description
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:813282
- UUID:
-
uuid:b37cc191-02ee-415d-85a7-f800429b4e4b
- Local pid:
- pubs:813282
- Deposit date:
- 2017-12-30
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Lopez-Persem et al
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2017 Lopez-Persem et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record