Journal article
vii —Nietzschean Genealogy and Philosophical Methodology
- Abstract:
- This paper explores how Nietzschean ‘deconstructive genealogies’ challenge core elements of philosophical methodology and social thought. Deconstructive genealogies reveal fragmentation and internal conflict within domains often presumed to be unified, such as our moral judgements. They thereby challenge projects of 'systematizing conservativism' that aim to impose coherence and systematicity on these domains through methods like conceptual analysis, functional explication, and reflective equilibrium. Moreover, inappropriate imposition of systematicity can likewise be a problem in social theory. The upshot is that such genealogies are often employed for ‘counter-reconciliatory’ projects in philosophy and ‘anti-noetic’ approaches in social theory.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 496.7KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1093/arisoc/aoaf006
Authors
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- Journal:
- Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society More from this journal
- Article number:
- aoaf006
- Publication date:
- 2025-08-15
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1467-9264
- ISSN:
-
0066-7374
- Language:
-
English
- Source identifiers:
-
3204537
- Deposit date:
-
2025-08-15
This ORA record was generated from metadata provided by an external service. It has not been edited by the ORA Team.
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record