- Abstract:
-
In the previous chapter, Stephen Levick presents several reasons for thinking that human reproductive cloning would be unacceptable even if it were safe. His main concern is that it is likely to have adverse psychological and social consequences. Levick takes an interesting approach. He discusses five existing situations that are analogous in some respect to human reproductive cloning. In each case he argues that human reproductive cloning is likely to involve either the same or more serious ...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher:
- Wiley-Blackwell Publisher's website
- Pages:
- 98-101
- Host title:
- Contemporary Debates in Bioethics
- Publication date:
- 2013-08-05
- URN:
-
uuid:afb3c398-7e33-4121-aad6-205ef8abd355
- Source identifiers:
-
581109
- Local pid:
- pubs:581109
- ISBN:
- 978-1-4443-3714-3
- Copyright holder:
- John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
- Copyright date:
- 2013
- Notes:
- © 2014 John Wiley and Sons, Inc. The final version of this book chapter is available from Wiley.
Book section
A reply to Levick’s ‘Were it physically safe, reproductive human cloning would not be acceptable’
Actions
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record