Journal article

The Book of Job and the sex life of elephants: the limits of evidential credibility in eighteenth-century natural history and Biblical criticism

Publication status:: Published

Peer review status:: Peer reviewed

Actions

Email

Email this record

Send the bibliographic details of this record to your email address.

Your Email
Please enter the email address that the record information will be sent to.

-
Your message (optional)
Please add any additional information to be included within the email.
Cite

Cite this record

APA Style

Lifschitz, A. (2019). The Book of Job and the sex life of elephants: the limits of evidential credibility in eighteenth-century natural history and Biblical criticism. Journal of Modern History, 91(4), 739–775.

MLA Style

Lifschitz, A. “The Book of Job and the Sex Life of Elephants: the Limits of Evidential Credibility in Eighteenth-Century Natural History and Biblical Criticism.” Journal of Modern History, vol. 91, no. 4, University of Chicago Press, 2019, pp. 739–75.

Chicago Style

Lifschitz, A. 2019. “The Book of Job and the Sex Life of Elephants: the Limits of Evidential Credibility in Eighteenth-Century Natural History and Biblical Criticism.” Journal of Modern History 91 (4): 739–75.
Share
Print

Access Document

Files:: LifschitzAAM2019.pdf

(Preview, Accepted manuscript, pdf, 1.8MB, Terms of use)

Publisher copy:: 10.1086/705813

Authors

+ Lifschitz, A More by this author

Institution:: University of Oxford
Division:: HUMS
Department:: History Faculty
Oxford college:: Magdalen College
Role:: Author

Publisher:: University of Chicago Press
Journal:: Journal of Modern History More from this journal
Volume:: 91
Issue:: 4
Pages:: 739-775
Publication date:: 2019-12-01
Acceptance date:: 2018-11-15
DOI:: 10.1086/705813
EISSN:: 1537-5358
ISSN:: 0022-2801

Language:: English
Pubs id:: pubs:1043434
UUID:: uuid:a1fb0081-c06b-4adc-a485-becfbe5b837e
Local pid:: pubs:1043434
Source identifiers:: 1043434
Deposit date:: 2019-08-14

Terms of use

Copyright holder:: University of Chicago Press
Copyright date:: 2019
Rights statement:: © 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
Notes:: This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from University of Chicago Press at: https://doi.org/10.1086/705813

Licence:: Terms and Conditions of Use for Oxford University Research Archive

Views and Downloads

About views and downloads

If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP