- Abstract:
-
Neuroimaging studies on moral decision-making have thus far largely focused on differences between moral judgments with opposing utilitarian (well-being maximizing) and deontological (duty-based) content. However, these studies have investigated moral dilemmas involving extreme situations, and did not control for two distinct dimensions of moral judgment: whether or not it is intuitive (immediately compelling to most people) and whether it is utilitarian or deontological in content. By contra...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Publisher's version
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience Journal website
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 393-402
- Publication date:
- 2011
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1749-5024
- ISSN:
-
1749-5016
- URN:
-
uuid:981bf5f0-1390-48ca-9fff-2255b695955a
- Local pid:
- ora:6861
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Subjects:
- Copyright holder:
- G. Kahane et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2011
- Notes:
- This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Journal article
The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment
Actions
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record