Journal article icon

Journal article

'Goals' are not an integral component of imitation.

Abstract:

Several theories suggest that actions are coded for imitation in terms of mentalistic goals, or inferences about the actor's intentions, and that these goals solve the correspondence problem by allowing sensory input to be translated into matching motor output. We tested this intention reading hypothesis against general process accounts of imitation using the pen-and-cups task. The task has three components: participants place a pen in one of two cups, using their right or left hand, and one ...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Department:
Oxford, MSD, Experimental Psychology
Role:
Author
Journal:
Cognition
Volume:
114
Issue:
3
Pages:
423-435
Publication date:
2010-03-05
DOI:
EISSN:
1873-7838
ISSN:
0010-0277
URN:
uuid:97ef6820-a805-4b9c-8e26-bb07dcb797dd
Source identifiers:
257630
Local pid:
pubs:257630

Terms of use


Metrics


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP