Journal article
Reminding peer reviewers of reporting guideline items to improve completeness in published articles: primary results of 2 randomized trials
- Abstract:
-
Importance: Numerous studies have shown that adherence to reporting guidelines is suboptimal.
Objective: To evaluate whether asking peer reviewers to check if specific reporting guideline items were adequately reported would improve adherence to reporting guidelines in published articles.
Design, Setting, and Participants: Two parallel-group, superiority randomized trials were performed using ...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Preview, Supplementary materials, pdf, 367.7KB, Terms of use)
-
(Preview, Version of record, pdf, 1004.5KB, Terms of use)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17651
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- American Medical Association
- Journal:
- JAMA Network Open More from this journal
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 6
- Article number:
- e2317651
- Publication date:
- 2023-06-09
- Acceptance date:
- 2023-04-21
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2574-3805
- Pmid:
-
37294569
Item Description
- Language:
-
English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1458733
- Local pid:
-
pubs:1458733
- Deposit date:
-
2023-08-10
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Speich et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2023
- Rights statement:
- © 2023 Speich B et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
- Licence:
- CC Attribution (CC BY)
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record