Journal article
Property, analogy and variety
- Abstract:
- How should a court respond if a party argues that, because her right to an intangible asset is a property right, the defendant is under a strict duty not to interfere with that intangible asset? Our view is that such a conclusion does not follow from the premise, and the argument is really one that the party's right deserves protection as it is sufficiently analogous to a right to a tangible asset.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Journal website
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 1
- Pages:
- 161-186
- Publication date:
- 2022-03-07
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1464-3820
- ISSN:
-
0143-6503
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
1254942
- Local pid:
- pubs:1254942
- Deposit date:
- 2022-11-09
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- McFarlane and Douglas
- Copyright date:
- 2022
- Rights statement:
- © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)
Metrics
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record