Supplementary Tables for: 
Distinctive gene expression in the reduced first thoracic legs of a nymphalid butterfly
Asia E. Hoile, Peter O. Mulhair, Peter W.H. Holland
Read Me
Table S1: Specimen collection data, showing which individuals were pooled for RNA sequencing and the corresponding NCBI SRA accession numbers.
Table S2: Raw reads counts per sample for all loci. Sample names along the top: T1 legs, T2 legs, T3 legs, Labial palps for each replicate
Table S3: fpkm per sample for all loci. 
Table S4: DESeq2 output for the comparison T1 legs vs T2 legs giving baseMean, log2FoldChange and statistical analysis. Positive log2FoldChange values indicate higher expression in T1 compared to T2.
Table S5: DESeq2 output for the comparison T1 legs vs T3 legs giving baseMean, log2FoldChange and statistical analysis. Positive log2FoldChange values indicate higher expression in T1 compared to T3.
Table S6: DESeq2 output for the comparison T2 legs vs T3 legs giving baseMean, log2FoldChange and statistical analysis. Positive log2FoldChange values indicate higher expression in T2 compared to T3.
Table S7: DESeq2 output for the comparison T1 legs vs Palps legs giving baseMean, log2FoldChange and statistical analysis. Positive log2FoldChange values indicate higher expression in T1 legs compared to palps.
Table S8: DESeq2 output for the comparison T2 legs vs palps legs giving baseMean, log2FoldChange and statistical analysis. Positive log2FoldChange values indicate higher expression in T2 legs compared to palps.
Table S9: DESeq2 output for the comparison Palps vs T3 legs giving baseMean, log2FoldChange and statistical analysis. Positive log2FoldChange values indicate higher expression in Palps compared to T3 legs.
Table S10: Identification of T1-enriched genes. Column A gives loci enriched in T1 legs compared to Palps. Colum B gives loci enriched in T1 legs compared to T2. These two lists are then compared to give two indications of T1-specific features (within this dataset), as follows. Column F gives the 47 loci which are more highly expressed in T1 legs in both comparisons (higher in T1 than palp, and higher in T1 than T2). Column G gives the 59 loci that are expressed less in T1 legs in both comparisons (lower in T1 than palp, lower in T1 than T2). Columns F and G combined gives 106 loci.
Table S11: List of 277 loci enriched in Palp and T1 legs compared vs T2 legs, giving gene ID, orthogroup, top BLAST hit, putative gene type based on BLASTp, Pfam ID, and mean fpkm per tissue type. The 25 genes shaded in pink in column 1 in excel doc (or marked DE in csv file) are DE (differentially expressed) between Palp and T1 legs.
Table S12: List of 286 loci with lower expression in Palp and T1 legs compared vs T2 legs
Table S13: List of 59 loci enriched in Palp and T2 legs compared vs T1 legs
Table S14. Putative chemosensory loci: fpkm for each individual sample.
Table S15: Putative phototransduction genes: fpkm for each sample. 
Table S16: The 50 proteomes used in the analysis of gene origins and gene family expansions in Nymphalidae evolution, giving accession numbers, project provider and references. 
Table S17. Gene count within OG0000217 for each species.
Table S18. Gene count within each subclade of OG0000217 for each species.
Table S19. Information on mode of origin, BLAST hits, and pfam functional domain annotation for 57 OGs gained on the Nymphalidae branch.
