Journal article
Further thoughts on the syntax of Il. 5.265-269
- Abstract:
- In response to a recent article by P. Probert on the same passage, it is argued that we need not assume that Il. 5.265–269 obliquely refers to an otherwise unknown ‘stud farm’ of Zeus if we want to maintain that the phenomenon of attractio relativi is only attested in post-Homeric times. The relative pronoun ἧς on which Probert’s reading is based should rather be understood as representing either a ‘descriptive’ genitive or, even more likely, an early instance of the genitive of price.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Access Document
- Files:
-
-
(Accepted manuscript, pdf, 124.4KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1163/1568525X-12342320
Authors
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Brill Academic Publishers Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Mnemosyne Journal website
- Volume:
- 70
- Issue:
- 5
- Pages:
- 859–866
- Publication date:
- 2017-06-01
- Acceptance date:
- 2016-10-05
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1568-525X
- ISSN:
-
0026-7074
- Source identifiers:
-
648000
Item Description
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:648000
- UUID:
-
uuid:8254d1b3-095f-4df3-9642-a5a441d82576
- Local pid:
- pubs:648000
- Deposit date:
- 2016-10-05
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Koninklijke Brill NV
- Copyright date:
- 2017
- Notes:
- Copyright © 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV. This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Brill at: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525X-12342320
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record