- Abstract:
- In this response, we first tackle what we take to be the core disagreement between ourselves and Hammersley, namely the justification for our model of social research ethics governance. We then consider what follows from our defence of governance for ethics review and show how these claims attend to the specific concerns outlined by Hammersley.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Files:
-
-
(pdf, 124.0KB)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1136/medethics-2018-104975
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
- Publisher:
- BMJ Publishing Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Journal of Medical Ethics Journal website
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 10
- Pages:
- 719-720
- Publication date:
- 2018-06-26
- Acceptance date:
- 2018-05-31
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
1473-4257
- ISSN:
-
0306-6800
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:859958
- URN:
-
uri:81cecdda-b9c0-4ca0-af0c-584603a8380b
- UUID:
-
uuid:81cecdda-b9c0-4ca0-af0c-584603a8380b
- Local pid:
- pubs:859958
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Copyright holder:
- Sheehan et al.
- Copyright date:
- 2018
- Notes:
- © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is the author accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from BMJ Publishers at: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104975
Journal article
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
Actions
Access Document
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record