Journal article icon

Journal article

A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway with the facemask and oropharyngeal airway for manual ventilation by first responders in children.

Abstract:
In adults, first responders to a cardiopulmonary arrest provide better ventilation using a laryngeal mask airway than a facemask. It is unclear if the same is true in children. We investigated this by comparing the ability of 36 paediatric ward nurses to ventilate the lungs of 99 anaesthetised children (a model for cardiopulmonary arrest) using a laryngeal mask airway and using a facemask with an oropharyngeal airway. Anteroposterior chest wall displacement was measured using an ultrasonic detector. Nurses achieved successful ventilation in 74 (75%) of cases with the laryngeal mask airway and 76 (77%) with facemask and oropharyngeal airway (p = 0.89). Median (IQR [range]) time to first breath was longer for the laryngeal mask airway (48 (39-65 [8-149])) s than the facemask/airway (35 (25-53 [14-120]) s; p < 0.0001). In 10 cases (10%) the lungs were ventilated using the laryngeal mask airway but not using the facemask/oropharyngeal airway. We conclude that ventilation is achieved rapidly using a facemask and oropharyngeal airway, and that the laryngeal mask airway may represent a useful second line option for first responders.
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06105.x

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Role:
Author


Journal:
Anaesthesia More from this journal
Volume:
64
Issue:
12
Pages:
1312-1316
Publication date:
2009-12-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1365-2044
ISSN:
0003-2409


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:242209
UUID:
uuid:7253b498-1f15-41fb-af6e-759adaad22db
Local pid:
pubs:242209
Source identifiers:
242209
Deposit date:
2012-12-19

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP