- Abstract:
-
Purpose: – The potential for including patients in implementation processes has received limited attention in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to explore the different roles adopted by 63 patients that emerged during and after four participatory quality improvement interventions, and the nature of their impact upon implementation processes and outcomes. Design/methodology/approach: – A cross-case ethnographic comparison of Experience-based Co-des... Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Version:
- Accepted Manuscript
- Funding agency for:
- Locock, ML
- Grant:
- Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (Project Number 10/1009/14)
- Publisher:
- Emerald Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Journal of Health Organization and Management Journal website
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 2
- Pages:
- 258-278
- Publication date:
- 2016
- DOI:
- ISSN:
-
1477-7266
- URN:
-
uuid:7031aef5-4121-4d29-b30a-4fbf48357446
- Source identifiers:
-
609574
- Local pid:
- pubs:609574
- Copyright holder:
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- Copyright date:
- 2016
- Notes:
- This is the ccepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Emerald at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-02-2015-0027
Journal article
What patients do and their impact on implementation process and outcomes during (and after) participatory quality improvement projects in English acute hospitals: Reflections from an ethnographic study
Actions
Authors
Funding
+ National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
More from this funder
+ National Institute for Health Research
More from this funder
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record