- The essay critically engages Woltertorff's account of justice by challenging the political status of its archeological defence of rights language, its prioritizing of 'primary' and therefore 'procedural' justice, its suggestion to think of rights as 'social bonds' and the validity of subjecting God and world under one and the same concept of 'worth'.
- Publication status:
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher copy:
- Copyright holder:
- Bernd Wannenwetsch
- Copyright date:
- The full-text of this article is not currently available in ORA, but you may be able to access the article via the publisher copy link on this record page. The final, definitive version of this paper has been published in Studies in Christian Ethics, 23(2), May 2010 by SAGE Publications Ltd. All rights reserved. © 2010 Bernd Wannenwetsch.
But to do right . . . Why the language of 'rights' does not do justice to justice
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record