Journal article icon

Journal article

Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?

Abstract:

We aimed to determine the reproducibility of assessments made by independent reviewers of papers submitted for publication to clinical neuroscience journals and abstracts submitted for presentation at clinical neuroscience conferences. We studied two journals in which manuscripts were routinely assessed by two reviewers, and two conferences in which abstracts were routinely scored by multiple reviewers. Agreement between the reviewers as to whether manuscripts should be accepted, revised or r...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1093/brain/123.9.1964

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MPLS
Department:
Engineering Science
Sub department:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering
Role:
Author
Journal:
Brain : a journal of neurology More from this journal
Volume:
123 ( Pt 9)
Issue:
9
Pages:
1964-1969
Publication date:
2000-09-01
DOI:
EISSN:
1460-2156
ISSN:
0006-8950
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:244481
UUID:
uuid:6e179e8c-fad9-47c2-b2d3-788f11c6bc42
Local pid:
pubs:244481
Source identifiers:
244481
Deposit date:
2012-12-19

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP