- Abstract:
- Currently, network meta-analyses (NMAs) are the only technique allowing to compare and rank numerous treatments across trials. Evidence produced by NMAs relies on pooled data from both direct and indirect comparisons within the studies. As such, NMAs are invaluable tools for informing clinical guidelines.
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Publisher:
- Cambridge University Press Publisher's website
- Journal:
- BJPsych Advances Journal website
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 6
- Pages:
- 396-398
- Publication date:
- 2019-10-08
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-08-12
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2056-4686
- ISSN:
-
2056-4678
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1046353
- UUID:
-
uuid:6c8a05d9-874b-4fba-aadd-c71c20a937de
- Source identifiers:
-
1046353
- Local pid:
- pubs:1046353
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Copyright holder:
- Riccardo De Giorgi
- Rights statement:
- © The Author 2019
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available online from Cambridge University Press at: https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2019.53
Journal article
The wh-questions of network meta-analyses
Actions
Authors
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record