Journal article icon

Journal article

‘An unimaginable challenge’: a cross-cultural qualitative study of ethics and decision-making around tracheostomy ventilation in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Abstract:

Background
The rate of tracheostomy with invasive ventilation (TIV) for patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) varies widely. Previous studies have shown that doctors’ values may affect decision-making. There have been no previous international qualitative comparisons of medical decision-making process for TIV or why practice varies.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 16 doctors actively involved in the management of ALS patients from Japan (n = 7), the UK (n = 5), and the US (n = 4). We used three hypothetical cases to explore decision-making. Conversations were transcribed and thematically analyzed.
Results
Our data reveals similarities but also marked differences in views between the US, the UK and Japan. Almost all participants stated that they ought to respect patient autonomy. However, their approaches varied. British participants wanted to (and felt that they should) respect patient autonomy, but they also believed that TIV was not a realistic option. US participants were likely to prioritize patient autonomy over other ethical principles, and Japanese participants were likely to limit patient autonomy indirectly. The option of TIV appeared to be heavily influenced by the availability of healthcare resources in all three countries. The high cost, limited availability and difficulty of treatment meant that particularly in the UK and the US, it is challenging to receive TIV even if patients wanted this.
Conclusions
Our study illustrates how the emphasis on autonomy varies along with variations in the way care is organized in the setting of highly resource intensive treatment and progressive severe disabling illness. There is a need to review elements of the decision-making process in all three countries. This includes the need for transparent, ideally centralized, decision-making guidelines about the provision of TIV. Although we investigated a rare neuromuscular disease, our results will be relevant to other diseases requiring highly resource-intensive treatment toward the end of life.

Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1080/23294515.2025.2474928

Authors


More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Research group:
Uehiro Oxford Institute
Role:
Author


More from this funder
Funder identifier:
https://ror.org/029chgv08
Grant:
203132/Z/16/Z


Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
Journal:
AJOB Empirical Bioethics More from this journal
Volume:
16
Issue:
3
Pages:
172–184
Publication date:
2025-03-19
Acceptance date:
2025-02-07
DOI:
EISSN:
2329-4523
ISSN:
2329-4515


Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
2086692
Local pid:
pubs:2086692
Deposit date:
2025-02-17

Terms of use



Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP