Patient-reported outcomes following treatment for localized prostate cancer: Helping decision making for patients and their physicians.

Journal article

When treatments are known to be successful with good oncological outcomes for specific cancers, most patients will be prepared to accept the proposed therapy and its consequences on quality of life. But when multiple, equally effective treatments are available and uncertainty about their benefits prevails with a substantial risk of overtreatment, the balance of risks between benefit and harm from adverse effects can dominate decision making. Such is the case in clinically localized prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–detected prostate cancer. Men affected by prostate cancer realize increasingly that survival and prostate cancer recurrencerates alone are insufficient to allow sound clinical decisions to be made and that there are trade-offs between cancer control and adverse treatment effects. Two articles in this issue of JAMA by Barocas and colleagues and by Chen and colleagues2 address this important problem.

Authors: Hamdy, F; Donovan, J

• Publication status: Published
• Peer review status: Peer reviewed
• Publisher: American Medical Association
• Journal: JAMA
• Volume: 317
• Issue: 11
• Pages: 1121-1123
• Publication date: 2017-03-01
• DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.1703
• ISSN: 1538-3598
• Language: English
• Keywords: Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Male; Patient Participation; Prostatic Neoplasms; Physicians; Decision Making; Humans