Journal article
Should the decisions of institutional review boards be consistent?
- Abstract:
-
In response to increasing concerns regarding inconsistency in the decision-making of institutional review boards (IRBs), we introduce the decision-maker's dilemma, which arises when complex, normative decisions must be made regularly. Those faced with such decisions can either develop a process of algorithmic decision-making, in which consistency is ensured but many morally relevant factors are excluded from the process, or embrace discretionary decision-making, which makes space for morally ...
Expand abstract
- Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
Actions
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
- Publisher:
- Wiley Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Ethics and Human Research Journal website
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 2-14
- Publication date:
- 2019-07-23
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-01-30
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2578-2363
- ISSN:
-
2578-2355
- Pmid:
-
31336039
- Source identifiers:
-
1035702
Item Description
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1035702
- UUID:
-
uuid:67bedf74-9680-420b-9e33-02d63d164a01
- Local pid:
- pubs:1035702
- Deposit date:
- 2019-07-31
Terms of use
- Copyright holder:
- Hastings Center
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © 2019 by The Hastings Center. All rights reserved.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500022
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record