- Abstract:
-
In response to increasing concerns regarding inconsistency in the decision-making of institutional review boards (IRBs), we introduce the decision-maker's dilemma, which arises when complex, normative decisions must be made regularly. Those faced with such decisions can either develop a process of algorithmic decision-making, in which consistency is ensured but many morally relevant factors are excluded from the process, or embrace discretionary decision-making, which makes space for morally ...
Expand abstract - Publication status:
- Published
- Peer review status:
- Peer reviewed
- Files:
-
-
(pdf)
-
- Publisher copy:
- 10.1002/eahr.500022
-
Version unsuitable
-
We have not obtained a suitable full-text for a given research output. See this page for more information.
-
Recently completed
-
Sometimes content is held in ORA but is unavailable for a fixed period of time to comply with the policies and wishes of rights holders.
-
Permissions
-
All content made available in ORA should comply with relevant rights, such as copyright. See this page for more information.
-
Clearance
-
Some thesis volumes scanned as part of the digitisation scheme funded by Dr Leonard Polonsky are currently unavailable due to sensitive material or uncleared third-party copyright content. We are attempting to contact authors whose theses are affected.
- Publisher:
- Wiley Publisher's website
- Journal:
- Ethics and Human Research Journal website
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 4
- Pages:
- 2-14
- Publication date:
- 2019-07-23
- Acceptance date:
- 2019-01-30
- DOI:
- EISSN:
-
2578-2363
- ISSN:
-
2578-2355
- Pmid:
-
31336039
- Pubs id:
-
pubs:1035702
- UUID:
-
uuid:67bedf74-9680-420b-9e33-02d63d164a01
- Source identifiers:
-
1035702
- Local pid:
- pubs:1035702
- Language:
- English
- Keywords:
- Copyright holder:
- Hastings Center
- Copyright date:
- 2019
- Rights statement:
- © 2019 by The Hastings Center. All rights reserved.
- Notes:
- This is the accepted manuscript version of the article. The final version is available from Wiley at: https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500022
Journal article
Should the decisions of institutional review boards be consistent?
Actions
Access Document
Why is the content I wish to access not available via ORA?
Bibliographic data (the information relating to research outputs) and full-text items (e.g. articles, theses, reports, etc.) arrive in ORA from several different sources. Unfortunately we are not able to make available the full-text for every research output.
Please contact the ORA team (
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
) if you have queries regarding unavailable content OR if you are aware of a full-text copy we can make available.
Content may be unavailable for the following four reasons
Alternative access to the full-text
You may be able to access the full-text directly from the publisher's website using the 'Publisher Copy' link in the 'Links & Downloads' box from a research output's ORA record page. This method may require an institutional or individual subscription to the journal/resource.
Authors
Funding
Bibliographic Details
Item Description
Terms of use
Metrics
Altmetrics
Dimensions
If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record