Journal article icon

Journal article

Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: A cross-sectional diagnostic study

Abstract:

BACKGROUND:The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting in RCT reports by early career researchers (ECRs) using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process. METHODS:We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic study of 119 manuscripts, from BMC series medical journals, BMJ, BMJ Open, and Annals of Emergency Medi...

Expand abstract
Publication status:
Published
Peer review status:
Peer reviewed

Actions


Access Document


Publisher copy:
10.1186/s12916-019-1436-0

Authors


More by this author
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0001-8819-0061
More by this author
Institution:
University of Oxford
Division:
MSD
Department:
NDORMS
Sub department:
Centre for Statistics in Medicine
Role:
Author
ORCID:
0000-0002-6881-6984
Publisher:
BioMed Central
Journal:
BMC Medicine More from this journal
Volume:
17
Article number:
205
Publication date:
2019-11-19
Acceptance date:
2019-09-27
DOI:
EISSN:
1741-7015
Pmid:
31744489
Language:
English
Keywords:
Pubs id:
pubs:1075933
UUID:
uuid:5cb015be-041a-4fdc-8dd5-8d47b9f9a8db
Local pid:
pubs:1075933
Source identifiers:
1075933
Deposit date:
2020-01-07

Terms of use


Views and Downloads






If you are the owner of this record, you can report an update to it here: Report update to this record

TO TOP